Skip to content
Lewis Chong logo

Project comparison

Orion Residence vs The Conlay

Orion Residence and The Conlay are both city investments, but the decision depends on exact location, price point, rental audience and holding power.

Lewis recommendation

Choose Orion Residence for lower density and Bukit Bintang retail-lifestyle walkability. Choose The Conlay for KLCC's corporate/diplomatic tenant pool and stronger developer pedigree. Pull current resale listings for both before deciding — brochure entry prices don't reflect today's market.

Quick summary

Quick Facts

A fact-sheet summary so you can understand the page before reading the full analysis.

Best For

comparisons

Risk Level

Low-Medium

Lewis Verdict

Choose Orion Residence for lower density and Bukit Bintang retail-lifestyle walkability. Choose The Conlay for KLCC's corporate/diplomatic tenant pool and stronger developer pedigree. Pull current resale listings for both before deciding — brochure entry prices don't reflect today's market.

Source Check

Use brochure facts, rental portals, Brickz, EdgeProp, NAPIC, BNM, Google Maps and MRT Corp where relevant

Price & size

From RM1.6M, 491–1,329 sqft vs From RM1.55M, 743–1,335 sqft

Orion has a wider size range including smaller units; The Conlay's smallest unit (743 sqft) is larger than Orion's.

Scale & density

298 units, 46 storeys vs 491 units, 52 storeys

Orion is the lower-density, more boutique of the two.

Developer & design

Orion Tower Sdn Bhd vs E&O + Mitsui Fudosan (Kerry Hill Architects)

The Conlay carries a stronger developer/architect pedigree story for resale positioning.

Quick summary

Quick verdict for Orion Residence vs The Conlay.

Good investment?

Conditional

Rental yield

Verify before booking

Choose Orion Residence for lower density and Bukit Bintang retail-lifestyle walkability. Choose The Conlay for KLCC's corporate/diplomatic tenant pool and stronger developer pedigree. Pull current resale listings for both before deciding — brochure entry prices don't reflect today's market.

Property comparisons

Research sources used.

Compare projects and areas side by side so buyers can see the trade-off between price, density, access, yield and developer strength.

Information checked

  • Price
  • Density
  • Land size
  • Accessibility
  • Rental yield
  • Developer reputation

Source checklist

  • Official developer brochure

    Density, unit size, facilities, land size, layout types and verified project facts.

  • Sales gallery

    Current master plan, latest package, available layouts and future development notes.

  • EdgeProp

    Market sentiment, area outlook, property news and buyer-facing market context.

How Lewis applies it

  1. 1Read the brochure first and record project facts from verified project material.
  2. 2Check the current sales-gallery update for price, package, availability and layout changes.
  3. 3Compare competing projects by access, density, land size, rental logic and exit buyer profile.
  4. 4Summarise the recommendation in plain language: who should consider it, who should avoid it and why.

Verification note

Brochure facts are preferred for static details, while price, package and availability must be reconfirmed before booking.

View full methodology

Decision Proof Table

The visible basis for this recommendation before applying it to a real property shortlist.

Factor

Rental demand

Buyer Question

Who will rent or buy this later?

Lewis Comment

Choose Orion Residence for lower density and Bukit Bintang retail-lifestyle walkability. Choose The Conlay for KLCC's corporate/diplomatic tenant pool and stronger developer pedigree. Pull current resale listings for both before deciding — brochure entry prices don't reflect today's market.

Factor

Main risk

Buyer Question

What can go wrong?

Lewis Comment

Both are premium city-centre towers — high maintenance fees and furnishing costs are typical for either

Factor

Next comparison

Buyer Question

What should I compare next?

Lewis Comment

Review project facts.

Overview

Both are completed freehold towers priced from roughly RM1.55–1.6M. Orion Residence is the more boutique option — 298 units across 46 storeys in Bukit Bintang, steps from Pavilion KL and Bukit Bintang MRT/Monorail. The Conlay is larger (491 units, 52 storeys) in KLCC, next to Conlay MRT and one stop from KLCC East and TRX, developed by E&O with Mitsui Fudosan and designed by Kerry Hill Architects.

Capital appreciation potential

The Conlay's E&O/Mitsui Fudosan/Kerry Hill pedigree and KLCC address support a premium resale story, but its larger 491-unit count means more direct competition among owners reselling or renting at the same time. Orion's lower density (298 units) can mean less internal competition, but Bukit Bintang's retail-district positioning is a different tenant story than KLCC's corporate/diplomatic draw.

Lewis recommendation

Since both are already completed, don't rely on brochure promises — pull actual recent transacted prices and rental listings for both towers before deciding. Compare exact floor, view, and furnishing condition rather than headline entry price, since both start within RM50K of each other.

Pros

  • Both are completed, freehold, and already have real transaction history to check — unlike pre-launch projects
  • Orion's lower unit count (298) may mean less rental/resale competition within the building
  • The Conlay's E&O/Mitsui Fudosan/Kerry Hill pedigree gives it a stronger design-and-developer resale narrative

Cons / risks

  • Both are premium city-centre towers — high maintenance fees and furnishing costs are typical for either
  • Orion's smaller units (from 491 sqft) sit at a much higher implied PSF than its RM1.6M headline entry suggests once floor and view premiums are added
  • Neither entry price here reflects current resale listings — always pull live transacted data before comparing

FAQ

Which is bigger, Orion Residence or The Conlay?

The Conlay has more units (491 vs 298) and more storeys (52 vs 46), but Orion Residence's size range starts smaller (491 sqft vs The Conlay's 743 sqft minimum).

Is The Conlay's developer pedigree worth the price?

E&O, Mitsui Fudosan and Kerry Hill Architects add a resale narrative, but pedigree alone doesn't guarantee yield — check actual rental listings for both towers before assuming it.

What is the main risk in Orion Residence vs The Conlay?

Both are premium city-centre towers — high maintenance fees and furnishing costs are typical for either

What should I ask Lewis after reading Orion Residence vs The Conlay?

Ask for latest project package, rental estimate, transaction evidence, floor plan, maintenance estimate and suitable alternatives.

What sources should be checked?

Use brochure facts, rental portals, Brickz, EdgeProp, NAPIC, Bank Negara, Google Maps, MRT Corp and developer master plans where relevant.

Can this page guarantee investment return?

No. It is an advisory framework. Rental, resale and capital growth depend on entry price, unit selection, market cycle and holding power.

What to compare next.

Continue with the most relevant guide, comparison, calculator or project shortlist before asking Lewis for the latest facts.

Ask Lewis about Orion Residence vs The Conlay

Send your budget, target area, buying purpose and timeline so Lewis can apply this analysis to your real shortlist.

WhatsApp Lewis